Legal Opinion

Devore v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 8, 2002No. A02A1383PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

At issue is whether an amended version of OCGA § 46-7-12 (c) allowing a direct action against the insurer of a motor common carrier, despite the failure to file prescribed forms evidencing the insurance policy, should be applied retroactively. Because applying the amended statute does not affect vested substantive rights, we find it has retroactive application. Accordingly, the trial court erred by refusing to give retroactive application to the statute and by refusing to allow a direct action against the motor carrier’s insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

Kevin…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Polito v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Kinard v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Harris v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. The Fischer Auto & Service Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sapp v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. Gresham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Kromer v. BechtelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. McConville v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Morgan Driveaway, Inc. v. Canal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API