Legal Opinion

Morris v. Townsend

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 30, 1968No. 43686PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The trial judge was authorized by Code Ann. § 6-804 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 21) to grant, without motion or notice to the plaintiff and even over the plaintiff’s objection, an extension of time for the filing of the defendant’s transcript of the evidence in connection with his motions for a new trial and for judgment n.o.v. The fact that the written order granting the extension was not entered until over a month after the court’s previously ordered filing date does not invalidate the extension, since said order vacated all previous orders and indicated a prior, implicit…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Birmingham Fertilizer Co. v. DozierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. DG MACHINERY & GAGE COMPANY v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Boswell v. IvieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Dickey v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nipper v. Crisp CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Jones v. ItsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API