Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kayla Vaughn v. Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided February 10, 2015No. 2013-CC-01179-COAPublished

1Dissent

*453. GRIFFIS, P.J.,

dissenting:

¶ 33. The question to be decided is: who is entitled to be paid $110,163.58, the amount of the remaining guaranteed annuity payments that were owed by PERS at the death of Marjorie Kahn’s designated beneficiary, Heather Vaughn? The majority concludes that Marjorie’s estate is entitled to the payment. I find that Heather’s heirs are entitled to the payment. Therefore, I respectfully dissent. > • •

FACTS;AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 34. I disagree slightly with the majority’s version of the facts and procedural history. The majority makes it appear as if Kayla Vaughn was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stone v. Independent Linen Service Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  2. USPCI of Miss. v. State Ex Rel. McGowanMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. PUBLIC EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. PorterMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Dillon v. BealMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API