Legal Opinion

Barlow v. Myers

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1875Published

APPEAL by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought by Samuel L. M. Barlow, and others, against Maria J. Myers, upon three promissory notes, altogether amounting to $3,900 and interest. The facts were these: Prior to April 3, 1871, Charles M. Randall and George P. Williams were copartners, carrying on business in the city of New York, under the firm name of Randall & Williams.

Read the full summary

APPEAL by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought by Samuel L. M. Barlow, and others, against Maria J. Myers, upon three promissory notes, altogether amounting to $3,900 and interest. The facts were these: Prior to April 3, 1871, Charles M. Randall and George P. Williams were copartners, carrying on business in the city of New York, under the firm name of Randall & Williams. On the date last mentioned, the firm had oustanding, besides other obligations, the three promissory notes above mentioned. These notes had been given…

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

The defendant, upon a sale of the partnership effects of the" firm of Randall & Williams, agreed to discharge certain debts, including notes then held by Nathan Randall for moneys loaned, and which were subsequently, and before maturity, *185and for value transferred to the plaintiffs. The defendant, at the time of the sale and agreement mentioned, held a note of Nathan Randall for $500, which was past due, and which she set up as a counter-claim, and offered to prove. On the trial before the referee, it was disallowed and judgment given for the plaintiffs on the notes.

Two questions are presented…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Kelly v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Merritt v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  4. Wilder v. KeelerNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  5. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Westchester County BankNew York Supreme Court · 1847

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API