North Highland Inc. v. Jefferson Machine & Tool Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
*547REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J.
(■dissenting).
¶ 128. The circuit court's dismissal of North Highland, Inc.'s complaint against Frederick Wells reflects an improperly narrow conception of what constitutes a "trade secret" as well as a misapplication of the doctrine of claim preclusion.1 Because I conclude that a confidential bid can be a trade secret and that an adversary action in Dwain Trewyn's federal bankruptcy proceedings does not necessarily preclude North Highland's claims against Wells in state court, I would reverse the decision of the court of appeals and therefore respectfully dissent.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.