Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Transportation v. Karp Associates, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 9, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs, and the branch of occupant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the petition is denied.

In this summary proceeding by the Commissioner of Transportation, a condemnor, to remove a condemnee occupant {see Highway Law § 30 [7]; EDPL 405; RPAPL art 7) from property acquired for the Kosciuszko Bridge Project, petitioner appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted the branch of a motion by occupant seeking summary judgment dismissing the petition.

Contrary to occupant’s contention and the Civil…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olean Urban Renewal Agency v. HermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Commissioner of Transportation v. V.A.S.T. Resources, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Commissioner of Transportation v. Sunny Lumber Supply NY, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API