Township of Kalkaska v. Fletcher
Michigan Supreme Court
Case made from Kalkaska. (Aldrich, J.) Case submitted without suit. Defendants assign error. The facts are stated in the opinion. 1. It is the hiring of a place of storage that is made a ground for taxation; citing Hood v. Judkins, 61 Mich. 580; Huckins v. Boston, 4 Cush. 543; Loud v. Charlestown, 103 Mass. 278; Campbell v. Machias, 33 Me. 419; Desmond v. Machias Port, 48 Id. 478; Lee v. Templeton, 6 Gray, 579.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This cause was tried in the circuit court for Kalkaska county before the court without a jury, upon •an agreed state of facts, as provided by section 6469, How. Stat., and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $34.98, without costs of suit. Defendants assign error.
The facts upon which the court based its judgment are that in September, 1888, an attachment suit was brought by Fletcher, Jenks & Co., who reside in and whose place of business is in Detroit, against Noteware & Beebe, upon which the sheriff of Kalkaska county attached certain goods forming a stock of hardware,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Greilick v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1925