Brooks v. City of Sioux City
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Gourt. — Hon. George W. Wakekield, Judge. Action for personal injuries alleged to have been received by reason of a defective sidewalk. Judgment on verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.
*6421 2 *641While there is a general assertion in appellant’s argument that the instructions were erroneous, *642and that the verdict is without support in the. evidence, the only assignments argued are those based on rulings in the introduction of evidence. Of these there are 59, in all of which, save 4, the reference to the page of the abstract on which the alleged ruling is shown is left blank, and there is no other sufficiently definite reference. The rulings which are sufficiently referred to are correct. The objections of appellant to the questions asked were interposed after the answers had been…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. BentleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Dempsey v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Diesing v. SpencerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Morrison v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Renshaw v. DignanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.