Legal Opinion
Barnhart v. ZHB of Nottingham Twp.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 28, 1980No. Appeal, 181 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
The Washington County Common Pleas Court affirmed the finding of the Nottingham Township Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) that the boarding of horses was not a agricultural use within the meaning of the zoning ordinance. Dorothy Barnhart appeals. We reverse.
The facts are as follows:
Barnhart is the lessee of 65 acres of ground in Nottingham Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania, used for the boarding and riding of approximately 33 horses owned by 19 separate owners. At the time of the hearing, the property in question was zoned A-l Agricultural/R-l Residential. In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Village 2 at New Hope, Inc. AppealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Brunner v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- BURGOON v. ZH BD. of CHARLESTOWN T.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Appeal of St. Sophia Religious Ass'n of Ukrainian Catholics, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- Laird v. City of McKeesportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- D. E. Street, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of West YorkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In re Appeal of Ethken Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Corbet v. Board of Shawnee County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
- Corbet v. BOARD OF SHAWNEE COUNTY COMM'RS.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.