Hull v. Chicago, Burlington & Pacific R'y Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaslta Circuit Court. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
Several causes of action are stated in the petition. The first is that, in consideration of the conveyance of the right of way over certain real estate of the plaintiff, the defendant had agreed to fence the right of way, and put in two open crossings, which it had failed to do; second, that the defendant had entered upon plaintiff’s premises outside of the right of way, aud had committed a trespass by cutting ditches and removing earth; third, that the defendant had carelessly and negligently constructed its road by the erection of an embankment, so as to obstruct the natural flow of water,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Varner v. St. L. & C. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of SeylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- In the Interest of K.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- State v. McCraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Manning v. MathewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Moseley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.