Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alabama Renal Stone Institute, Inc. v. State Health Planning Agency

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 14, 1992No. 1901211, 1901271Published

1DissentSteagall, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to quash the writ in this case. The hospitals’ use of the mobile extracorporeal shockwave lithotripter to treat kidney stones does not constitute a “new institutional health service” under Ala.Code 1975, § 22-21-263(a)(4). The Court of Civil Appeals specifically stated that “[tjhere is no dispute that the Hospitals here have a history of providing their patients with some form of a kidney stone treatment.” Alabama Renal Stone Institute, Inc. v. State Health Planning Agency, 594 So.2d 106, (Ala.Civ.App.1991). Nevertheless, that court went on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Koch v. HOUSTON COUNTY HOSP. BD.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  2. Alabama Renal Stone Institute v. ShpaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API