Legal Opinion
Pasdon v. City of Peabody
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 9, 2005No. 04-2314PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
This matter is before us on appeal from a dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). 1 We affirm the decision of the district court. The standard for evaluating a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings is essentially the same as that for deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. “[T]he trial court must accept all of the nonmovant’s well-pleaded factual averments as true, and draw all reasonable inferences in his favor.” Riv era-Gomez v. de Castro, 843 F.2d 631, 635 (1st Cir.1998) (internal citations omitted). The motion should not be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Marrero-Gutierrez v. MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Thomas Edward UzenskiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Latin American Music Co. v. Archdiocese of San Juan of the Roman Catholic & Apostolic ChurchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Asociación De Subscripción Conjunta Del Seguro De Responsabilidad Obligatorio v. Flores GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Ronald Jordan, Robert MacKay and the Mbta Police Patrolman's Union v. Joseph C. CarterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.