Legal Opinion

Katz Exclusive Millinery, Inc. v. Reichman

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 19, 1952No. 7451PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

The defendants seek a dismissal of the above action upon the grounds that one of the partners, namely, Dora Stern, does not reside- within the jurisdiction of the court.. They rely on the provisions of Section 1391, Title 28 U.S.C.A. as follows:

“(a) A civil action wherein jurisdiction is founded only on diversity of citizenship may, * * * be. brought only in the judicial district where all plaintiffs or all defendants reside.”

- Since the codefendant, Dora Stern, does hot reside in the judicial district, it is-obvious that the court, upon her objection, could not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SartoriousMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Gates v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Oldham v. HendersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1836
  4. Hodel-Mutti Manufacturing Co v. HamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Champion Spark Plug Company v. KarchmarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API