Legal Opinion

State v. Holcomb

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 1994No. C92-12-37654; CA A79794Published

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for burglary in the first degree after a trial to a jury. ORS 164.225. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial on the ground of juror misconduct. We reverse.

During voir dire, the court asked the prospective jurors, “Is there anyone who has ever been accused of a criminal offense, not counting traffic?” No juror, including Young, responded affirmatively. The court also asked whether any of the jurors had been a past victim of a burglar. Kalvelage answered that he had been a burglary victim about 10 years earlier. After the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carson v. BrauerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. McElwain v. KabatoffOregon Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API