State v. Holcomb
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for burglary in the first degree after a trial to a jury. ORS 164.225. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial on the ground of juror misconduct. We reverse.
During voir dire, the court asked the prospective jurors, “Is there anyone who has ever been accused of a criminal offense, not counting traffic?” No juror, including Young, responded affirmatively. The court also asked whether any of the jurors had been a past victim of a burglar. Kalvelage answered that he had been a burglary victim about 10 years earlier. After the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carson v. BrauerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- McElwain v. KabatoffOregon Supreme Court · 1976