Legal Opinion

Putney v. Bright

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Injunction. Before Judge Spence. Dougherty superior court. September 7, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

It is a well-settled rule, that equity will not enjoin a trespass, unless the damages are irreparable or the'trespasser is insolvent, or there are other circumstances which render the writ necessary or proper. . Civil Code, § 4916. • None of these circumstances are alleged in the petition for injunction'in the present case. Indeed it was admitted that the defendant, Putney, was abundantly able to respond to any damages which might be awarded against him. It seems that Putney organized a company for the purpose of selling a portion of his land to immigrants. The town was laid off into lots and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nottingham v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  2. Collier v. GarnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Shockley v. GarnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API