Legal Opinion

Herman J. Holmes v. Mississippi Shipping Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1962No. 18968_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Circuit Judge.

Holmes, the libelant-appellant (hereinafter sometimes called Holmes), appeals from the order of the court below maintaining exceptions filed by respondent-appellee, Mississippi Shipping Company, Inc. (hereinafter sometimes called Mississippi), on the ground that the claim for damages contained in the amended

libel did not aver facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Holmes states in his brief that the single question of law presented is: “Is a seaman entitled to recover damages for injuries caused by unseaworthiness of his former vessel, if the seaman himself…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. The Tungus v. SkovgaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Evan Lee Deakle, Jr. v. John E. Graham & Sons, a Corp. M/v Clara G., Her Engines, Hull, Tackle, Cargo and Appurtenances ThereofCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Rafferman v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Hill v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
  4. Smith v. American Mail Line, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1973
  5. Hines v. Bristol City Line (Canada) Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API