Legal Opinion · Dissent

Denver-Greeley Valley Water Users Ass'n v. McNeil

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1942No. 2489Published

1Dissent

BRATTON, Circuit Judge (dissenting).

With much said in the excellent opinion of the majority I agree, but not all of it. The judgment in the first case expressly provided that it should be enforced in accordance with the law of Colorado relating to irrigation districts which meant that it could be collected only out of funds accruing from special assessments against the land within the district. Privity existed between the irrigation district and its taxpayers, and therefore the judgment became binding upon all owners of land within the district subject to special assessment for the payment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Harshman v. Knox CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Chanute City v. TraderSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. A., T. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Com'rsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API