Legal Opinion

Sastrom v. Connecticut Psychiatric Security Review Board

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 25, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00640Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ROY SASTROM, Petitioner, v. No. 3:21-cv-640 (JAM) CONNECTICUT PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The petitioner Roy Sastrom is a federal prisoner in Arizona. He is due to finish his federal sentence later this year but is subject to continuing confinement in Connecticut because of a detainer that has been lodged with federal prison authorities by the Connecticut Psychiatric Security Review Board. Sastrom has filed a petition for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Alonzo Cook v. New York State Division of Parole, and New York State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Stanley Meadows v. State of New York and Warden of the United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. James Rubio v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API