Legal Opinion

Roth v. Kaptowsky

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1946No. 29212. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr, Justice Fulton

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case comes to us on leave to appeal heretofore granted to Fannie Kaptowsky, appellant. The foundation of the litigation is based on a promissory note in the amount of $4000, executed on January 16, 1928, by William Kaptowsky and Fannie Kaptowsky, his wife. On April 14, 1938, Julius Roth, the holder of the note, brought suit thereon in the municipal court of Chicago. The Kaptowskys, in their answer, admitted owing $1040 but contested the balance on the ground of usury. On November 16, 1939, judgment was entered for the amount admitted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gurnett v. Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Monahan v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Morris v. Central West Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Switchmen's Union of North America v. ColehouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Canadian Radium & Uranium Corp. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Confederation Life Association v. UgaldeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Marshall v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Christ Hospital v. GreenwaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Roth v. KaptowskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API