Legal Opinion

Cruz v. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. (In Re Crofford)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 14, 2004No. 04-6029EAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VENTERS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is an appeal of an order of the bankruptcy court 1 determining appropriate sanctions on remand. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the bankruptcy court’s order.

I. STANDARD OF REVIEW

The imposition of sanctions involves a consideration of three types of issues: factual, legal, and discretionary. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 399, 110 S.Ct. 2447, 2457, 110 L.Ed.2d 359 (1990). A court considers factual questions regarding the nature of the attorney’s inquiry prior to filing the pleading and the factual basis for the pleading. Next, the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Gardenia Gordon v. Unifund Ccr PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Crofford v. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. (In Re Crofford)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re BurghoffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
  2. Shodeen v. Petit (Burghoff)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API