Legal Opinion

Alabama MacHinery & Supply Co. v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 1931No. 3 Div. 951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Plaintiff invented a tractor wheel, and entered into a written contract with defendant (the salient features of which appear in the report of the case) for the manufacture and sale thereof, under the terms of which plaintiff was to receive a stipulated royalty. The royalty was not paid in full, and in this action plaintiff recovered a judgment therefor, from which defendant prosecutes this appeal.

Plaintiff made effort to have his invention patented, but thus far to no avail. His failure in this particular is made the basis for an alleged fraud, in that in some of the pleading to avoid the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  2. Tabor v. PetersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Burk v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. E. Bement & Sons v. La DowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1895
  5. Counts v. HarlanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sherrill v. Alabama Appliance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API