Legal Opinion

Farris v. Daigle

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 28, 1995No. 93-605PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

BATCHELDER, J.

The plaintiff, John Farris, appeals the decision of the Superior Court {Goode, J.) denying his request that court costs and statutory interest should be added to an arbitrators’ award. He argues that the trial court erred in refusing to consider an exact copy of a letter transmitted and reproduced via facsimile (fax) purportedly signed by the defendant’s then-counsel agreeing to payment of statutory interest and costs “as if the case were tried to a jury.” We reverse and remand.

*454The parties agreed, in the original proceeding, to submit to arbitration their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garand v. Town of ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. Lillie-Putz Trust v. DownEast Energy Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  3. Appeal of GilbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. Mountjoy v. PishonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API