Parmlee v. Brashear
Supreme Court of Louisiana
WesternDist. ATPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE OF THE SEVENTH PRESIDING. This is an action on a curator’s bond against the surety therein. The plaintiffs allege, that the estate of Robert S. Barr, deceased, in the Parish of St. Mary, is indebted to them in the sum of three hundred and sixty-seven dollars, with interest. That R. S. Brashear was duly appointed curator of said estate, with the defendant, Walter Brashear, his surety, in the bond.
Read the full summary
WesternDist. ATPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE OF THE SEVENTH PRESIDING. This is an action on a curator’s bond against the surety therein. The plaintiffs allege, that the estate of Robert S. Barr, deceased, in the Parish of St. Mary, is indebted to them in the sum of three hundred and sixty-seven dollars, with interest. That R. S. Brashear was duly appointed curator of said estate, with the defendant, Walter Brashear, his surety, in the bond. He further* alleges that the said curator had obtained a prolongation of his term, and renewed his bond ; but that he has…
1Opinion of the Court
Bullard, J,,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an action against the surety, on the bond of the curator of a vacant estate, in which the plaintiffs ask to *331recover the amount of their claim against the estate, on the allegation, that the curator had administered the estate in an illegal manner, and had never paid over to the petitioners the amount of this demand, though ordered to do so by a judgment of the Court of Probates, and that the curator had collected and converted to his use, the monies of the estate, which, he alleges, is perfectly solvent.
When a curator’s bond is forfeited…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hebert v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870