McGautha v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Brennan,
with whom Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Marshall join, dissenting.
These cases test the viability of principles whose roots draw strength from the very core of the Due Process Clause. The question that petitioners present for our decision is whether the rule of law, basic to our society and binding upon the States by virtue of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, is fundamentally inconsistent with capital sentencing procedures that are purposely constructed to allow the maximum possible variation from one case to the next, and provide no mechanism to…
2Cases cited167 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.