Legal Opinion
Chase v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of Baltimore
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 14, 1913No. 1,644PublishedCited by 16 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Joseph Buffington, Judge. Action at law by the Farmers’ & Merchants’ National Bank of Baltimore against Howard A. Chase. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, Circuit Judge.
On April 12, 1911, the Farmers’ & Merchants’ National Bank of Baltimore brought suit to recover more than $11,000 from Howard A. Chase, the maker of three promissory notes dated respectively August 8, September 4, and October 6, 1906. The affidavit of defense set up the following facts as—
“ * * * a just, true, and complete defense to the cause of action as set forth in plaintiff’s statement of claim.
“Defendant alleges: That héretofore and on or about the 27th day of March, 'A. D. 1907, he was duly adjudicated an involuntary bankrupt by proceedings commenced…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re McBrydeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1899
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Paddock. In Re Globe Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Harvey Company Limited v. BradenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Jackson v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Bracewell v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Uden v. Great Northern Const. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.