Holman v. Sorenson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ELLETT, Justice:
Respondents initiated this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and to recover damages for the breach of a construction contract. Appellants counterclaimed for breach. The trial court found that both parties had breached but awarded respondents (contractors) net damages in the sum of $7,321. The judgment stated that the computations were inclusive of the amounts to which appellants have been damaged and to which they were entitled by reason of respondents’ breach.
The question appellants bring before us is whether the trial court erred by omitting to deduct from respondents’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Bourke v. FriskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Keller v. Deseret Mortuary CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- Roberts v. C. F. Adams & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ringwood v. Foreign Auto Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- State in Re SchreuderUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Katzenberger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- John Call Engineering, Inc. v. Manti City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Darrell J. Didericksen & Sons, Inc. v. Magna Water & Sewer Improvement DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.