Legal Opinion

Aills v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1930No. 12929Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant earnestly insists that the charge of the trial court was fundamentally erroneous for the reason that same did not expressly refer to or submit to the jury that the killing must be upon malice aforethought. The indictment charged that the murder was upon malice aforethought. Appellant pleaded guilty and thus admitted all the material allegations of the indictment as well as the statutory elements of the crime charged. Bennett v. State, 98 Texas Crim. Rep. 661; Gipson v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep. 364; Williams v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep. 366,

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Gipson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API