Legal Opinion
Schiano v. Mijul, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 7, 2010PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal (1), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), entered June 5, 2009, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) from an order of the same court entered October 20, 2009, which denied those branches of their motion which were for leave to renew and reargue that branch of their prior motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Birnbaum v. New York Racing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Curtis v. Dayton Beach Park No. 1 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Braudy v. Best Buy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Carbajal v. Bobo Robo, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by27 opinions
- Amendola v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Johnson v. Culinary Institute of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Doviak v. Finkelstein & Partners, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Mahoney v. AMC Entertainment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Rodriguez v. Shoprite Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.