Snodgrass v. Cherry-Burrell Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
Since the decision of Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., 183 F. 2d 811 (D. C. Cir. 1950) much has been written by courts and commentators concerning the right of a wife to recover for loss of consortium due to injury negligently caused to her husband. Prosser, Torts (2d ed.) s. 103, p. 690; 1 Harper & James, Torts, s. 8.9; 17 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 183. The holding of that case that a wife has such a right has been adopted by a few jurisdictions, *57but in most where the question has arisen recovery by the wife has been denied. Thus the great weight of authority is opposed to the proposition advanced by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Neuberg v. BobowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Gaillard v. BoyntonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peter Igneri and Theresa Igneri v. Cie. De Transports OceaniquesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Roseberry v. StarkovichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Rush v. Great American Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.