Legal Opinion
Soo Line Railroad Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Third-Party v. David Bruce Overton, Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 3, 1993No. 91-2722Published
1Opinion of the Court
992 F.2d 640
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation,
Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David Bruce OVERTON, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-2722.
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
Argued April 8, 1992.
Decided March 31, 1993.
Rehearing Denied May 3, 1993.
1
Jack M. Freedman, Michael R. Conner, Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis, IN, Eric J. Magnuson (argued), Roger R. Roe, Jr., David T. Klapheke, Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiff-appellant.
2
C. Wendell Martin, Timothy E. Hollingsworth (argued), Martin, Wade, Hartley & Hollingsworth,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.