Legal Opinion

Twin Coast Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1989No. B037342PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FUKUTO, J.

I

In a libel case, by statute, a newspaper owner, by publishing a sufficient retraction, gains immunity from liability for general or punitive damages, remaining responsible only for any special damages suffered by the defamed plaintiff. To be sufficient for this purpose, the retraction must appear “in substantially as conspicuous a manner in said newspaper ... as were the statements claimed to be libelous.” (Civ. Code, § 48a.) 1 The issues presented in this mandate proceeding are whether the sufficiency of the retraction is a question for court or for jury, and, if the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Maressa v. New Jersey MonthlySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Nevada Independent Broadcasting Corp. v. AllenNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Turner v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Gomes v. FriedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weller v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Pierce v. San Jose Mercury NewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Hampton v. BlackmonMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Gavin C. Newsom v. Fox News Network, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API