North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1ConcurrenceGrice, Presiding Justice
I am in full accord with everything stated in the opinion except Division 1, as to making a constitutional attack.
While the law of the case has been established as to the sufficiency of the attacks made here by virtue of North Ga. Finishing v. Di-Chem, 230 Ga. 623 (198 SE2d 284), I desire to take this opportunity to express some views that I have on the subject.
Requirements for attacking the constitutionality of a statute have been in force for many years in this state. The following statement of them should suffice.
"In order to raise a question as to the constitutionality of a 'law’ . . . at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Bourn v. HerringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Stegall v. Southwest Ga. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Abel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.