Legal Opinion

Baby Jogger, LLC v. Britax Child Safety, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 19, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2:12cv452Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge.

Before this Court are cross-motions from Plaintiff and Defendant for summary judgment (ECF No. 86 and 93) pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of'Civil Procedure. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ pleadings, this matter is now ripe for judicial decision. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff Baby Jogger, LLC (“Baby Jogger”) alleges that Defendant Britax…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API