Baby Jogger, LLC v. Britax Child Safety, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge.
Before this Court are cross-motions from Plaintiff and Defendant for summary judgment (ECF No. 86 and 93) pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of'Civil Procedure. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ pleadings, this matter is now ripe for judicial decision. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff Baby Jogger, LLC (“Baby Jogger”) alleges that Defendant Britax…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.