Legal Opinion

Reine v. Pontchartrain R.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 3, 1919No. 22451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; E. K. Skinner, Judge. Action by George W. Reine against the Pontehartrain Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

[1) 2] Defendant appeals from a judgment allowing plaintiff $250 damages for personal injuries. He sued for $2,500. “for suffering and pain” from a scalp wound; but his learned counsel has frankly admitted in his argument that the injury was not so serious as he first thought it was; and he concedes in his printed brief that the $250 would compensate plaintiff for his suffering. No doubt appellant’s learned counsel also will acknowledge — for the record plainly supports the admission — -that the matter in dispute did not “exceed $2,000, exclusive of interest,” when the evidence was heard and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. French v. Trout Creek Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Ham v. Louisiana & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mancuso v. Joseph Chalona Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  2. Mancuso v. Joseph Chalona Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API