Inkit, Inc. v. airSlate, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INKIT, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-793-RGA v. AIRSLATE, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Before me is Defendant airSlate’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff Inkit’s complaint. (D.I. 120). I have reviewed the parties’ briefing. (D.I. 121, 135, 143). For the reasons set forth below, airSlate’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. After dismissal of its Lanham Act claim, the remaining counts of Inkit’s complaint allege a common law unfair competition claim, a Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices (“DTPA”) claim, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Interpace Corporation v. Lapp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Young v. JoyceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
- Lontex Corp v. Nike IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- Barnes Group Inc. v. Connell Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992