Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 16, 1977No. 77-999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the order of the trial court revoking appellant’s probation. See Thomas v. State, 317 So.2d 450 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). However, we agree with appellant that there are imperfections in his sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975), requires. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra. We remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API