Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Delaney

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 4, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The indictment in this case is laid under G. L. c. 266, § 16. The evidence at trial was such that it must have been obvious to the jury that the defendant was the only person in a position to contradict any of the Commonwealth’s witnesses. He did not take the stand and chose to rest at the close of the Commonwealth’s case. The jury convicted, and the defendant appealed, claiming numerous errors in the charge. We quote or summarize the salient features of the charge which are material to a proper disposition of the case as it has been argued to us.

"The fact that a person has been arrested or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MadeirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. SneedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. United States v. Nazario Garcia, United States of America v. Adrian GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. GouletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. PowersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. FordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. SmallMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API