Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Corigliano

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 6, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

In this accounting proceeding three objections have been raised by the special guardian for certain infants.

The first involves distribution pursuant to the third and fourth provisions of the will which are as follows: “Third: I hereby give and bequeath to the * * * (Church) * * * all that certain sum of money now on deposit in the Harlem Savings Bank”. The fourth provision is identical naming a different church as beneficiary and another bank account. When the will was drawn the account in the third paragraph contained $2,020.07, the fourth $487.34. At the date of death they…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. Quinn v. . HardenbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Pace v. PaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Trustees Church Home v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  5. In re the Estate of TartaglioNew York Surrogate's Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LunneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
  2. In re the Accounting of DanielsNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In re the Estate of NicholsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
  4. In re the Accounting of KennedyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  5. In re the Estate of SchillingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API