Legal Opinion

Oliwill v. Verdenhalven

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 19, 1891Published

Appeal from triál term. Action by Mary Oliwill against Daniel Verdenhalven. From a judgment -entered on a verdict for defendant, and from an order denying a motion for -a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from judgment for $387.50 costs for defendant upon verdict, and from order denying plaintiff’s motion for new trial. The action was brought December 16, 1887, to recover $5,000 damages by reason of defendant’s alleged negligence in the.care and maintenance of a tenement-house owned by him. The original answer was a general denial. A supplemental answer by leave of court was served January 24, 1889, setting up as a defense an accord and satisfaction of the cause of action between the parties for $200 paid plaintiff. Reply denied the alleged accord and satisfaction, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . McNairNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Oliwill v. VerdenhalvenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API