Lee v. Port Chester Costco Wholesale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“A defendant who moves for summary judgment in a slip- and-fall case has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that it neither created the dangerous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence for a sufficient length of time to discover and remedy it” (Van Dina v St. Francis Hosp., Roslyn, N.Y., 45 AD3d 673, 674 [2007]; see Torre v Huguenot Props., Inc., 77 AD3d 732 [2010]; Sloane v Costco Wholesale Corp., 49 AD3d 522, 523 [2008]; Doherty v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 265 AD2d 447, 448 [1999]). Here, the defendants established their prima facie entitlement to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bykofsky v. Waldbaum's Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Sloane v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Mercury Insurance Group v. OcanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Raghu v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Halpern v. Costco Warehouse/ Costco WholesaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Schiller v. GuthrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Willis v. Galileo Cortlandt, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Parker v. Raymond Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Payen v. Western Beef SupermarketAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.