States v. Garrett
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAYS, District Judge.
Daniel Lee Garrett pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924. His plea followed a suppression hearing at which the district court suppressed evidence found in a search of Garrett’s apartment but declined to suppress evidence found in Garrett’s car. Garrett’s guilty plea was conditional, Garrett having reserved the right to seek review of the decision not to suppress evidence found in his car. Garrett now appeals, claiming that the police officer who stopped him lacked reasonable suspicion to make the stop. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Cortez AveryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monroe v. McNairy CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Dye v. City of WarrenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005