Legal Opinion

Software Surgery, Inc. v. Park

Loudoun County Circuit Court

Decided May 18, 1998No. Case Nos. (Chancery) 18007, 18008 , 18009Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge James H. Chamblin

This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Strike Bill of Particulars. By agreement of the parties, the Plaintiff filed one Bill of Particulars addressing its claims in all three of the above-referenced suits. The Defendants now want that Bill of Particulars stricken because, at 102 pages and 471 numbered paragraphs, it is unnecessarily long and repetitive and serves only to obfuscate the issues rather than clarify them. Upon consideration of the record and of argument of counsel, the Motion is denied for the reasons that follow.

The Defendants rely…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marshall v. DeanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API