Legal Opinion

Boston Elevated Ry. v. Greaney

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 29, 1934No. 2817PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, District Judge.

This is an action in tort for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant.

The answer of the defendant denies the allegations of negligence on its part and alleges that the plaintiff was not on her part in the exercise of due care. There was a verdict *658for the plaintiff. The only issue presented is that raised by the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a directed .verdict. We have then two inquiries: Does the record disclose evidence which is sufficient, as a matter of law, to warrant a finding by the jury of,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Hudson v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Kaminski v. FournierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Barrett v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. McGuiggan v. AtkinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. Pinkerton Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
  2. Long Transp. Co. v. DomuratCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API