Legal Opinion

Twitty v. . Cochran

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarNhill, J.

There was sufficient evidence to sustain the answer of the jury to the first issue. The assignments of error directed to the admission of evidence on this issue, and to the charge of the court relating thereto, are without substantial merit. The jury having failed to answer the other issues, the remaining exceptions become immaterial and do not require consideration.

The deed to plaintiff being a voluntary one made for a fraudulent purpose, the Connor Act, now C. S., 3309, has no application here. This act protects only creditors or purchasers for a valuable consideration against unrecorded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Spence v. . Pottery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Harris v. Dudley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Gosney v. . McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Tyner v. Barnes.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Case v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API