Legal Opinion · Dissent

Steele v. O'Neal

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 26, 2011No. 2100259Published

1DissentThomas, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for the joinder of Jackson County as an indispensable party to the action. The county is an indispensable party to an action seeking to determine whether a road is public or private. Boles v. Autery, 554 So.2d 959, 962 (Ala.1989).

*572“The trial court’s determination of whether the road was public or was private might affect not only the rights of the individual litigants but also the rights of members of the public to use the road, the duty of the county to maintain it, and the liability of the county for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Byrd Companies, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. JR McCLENNEY AND SON, INC. v. ReimerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Boles v. AuterySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Geer Bros., Inc. v. WalkerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API