Legal Opinion

State v. Priebnow

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Bill of exceptions from Cuming county district court on behalf of plaintiff filed under the provisions of §§ 515 and 516 of the criminal code. cited: State v. Ferm, 41 Conn., 590. Parker v. The State, 39 Ala., 365. U. S. v. Barry, 4 Cranch, 606. McDevil v. The State, 20 Ohio State. 23 Bishop Statutory Crimes, 443. Comp. Stat., 727, § 412. Wharton’s Grim. Law, 614. State v. Watrous, 13 Iowa, 489.

1Opinion of the Court

Lake, Ch. J.

This record is brought here by the district attorney of the seventh judicial district, pursuant to secs. 515 and 516 of the criminal code, for the purpose of having certain rulings of the court below, resulting in the discharge of the defendants in error from custody, reviewed.

Whatever the views of this court may be upon the questions presented, the judgment of the district court must stand'as the law of that particular case, for sec. 517 of said code provides that, it “shall not be reversed, nor in any manner affected; but the decision of the supreme court shall determine the law…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. PriebnowNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API