Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1964No. Crim. 8509PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRoth, J.

Appellant and two codefendants, Jeter and Hampton, were convicted by a jury of violating Penal Code, section 211: robbery. Jeter and Hampton have not appealed.

The victim of the robbery (Stoskopf), riding a streetcar from the city of Downey to Los Angeles, shared a drink of whiskey with appellant from a bottle he was carrying and as a consequence appellant guided Stoskopf to a poolhall where Stoskopf started to play a game of pool with a man other than appellant. Stoskopf abruptly terminated the play when some money he had left in a pocket on the table disappeared without explanation. Stoskopf…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. AcostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. MacIelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. MercerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. JenningsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. People v. GriegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API