Legal Opinion
Rhoades v. United States
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 21, 1997No. Civil Action 95-616 MMSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
■ MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
Introduction
On October 16,1995, plaintiffs Viktoria and Donald Rhoades filed a claim against the United States pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. (1997), alleging damages arising out of the Government’s negligence during construction work at the Dover Air Force base. On February 15,1996, the plaintiffs amended their complaint to join R.S. Hogan, Inc. (“Hogan”), the construction contractor, as a defendant. Hogan asserted a cross-claim against the United States on June 17, 1996, and the United States…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Richard Leander Ferebee, Jr. v. Chevron Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Alice L. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 2936, Pens. Plan Guide P 23919d Charles John Epright v. Environmental Resources Management, Inc. Health and Welfare Plan Erm Enviroclean Noble Lowndes/johnson, Administrator John Doe Trustees, 1 Through 10 in Their Capacity as Trustees of the Environmental Management, Inc. Health and Welfare Plan Chief Financial Officer, Environmental Resources Management, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018