Legal Opinion

CIM, LLC v. Series Protected Cell 1, A Series of Oxford Insurance Company TN, LLC

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided October 27, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00479Unknown

1Opinion

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CIM, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:23-cv-00479 ) SERIES PROTECTED CELL 1, a Series of ) JUDGE CAMPBELL OXFORD INSURANCE COMPANY TN, ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 18), brought under Federal Rule of Civil 12(c), which is fully briefed. (Doc. Nos. 25, 26). For the reasons discussed below, the motion (Doc. No. 18) is DENIED. This case arises from a certain Actual Net Loss Insurance policy (the “Policy”) issued by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peggy Greenberg and Pamela Rossmann, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. The Life Insurance Company of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Essex Hayward v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Moore & Associates, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Tata v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Jerry Garrison v. Rita BickfordTennessee Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API