Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Abdiehl v. Sriver

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1936No. 26,581PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTremain, J.

The relator instituted this action in the lower court against the appellees upon a patrolman’s official bond. The complaint is in two paragraphs.

The amended first paragraph of the third amended complaint alleges that the appellee, Willis H. Sriver, was a duly appointed and qualified patrolman in the city of South Bend, Indiana; that he executed his bond payable to said city in the sum of $1,000 with his coappellee, National Surety Company, as surety thereon. The bond was delivered to and approved by the board of public safety of said city, and said Sriver entered upon his duties as patrolman…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. FlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hawkins v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Granger v. BoswinkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Bank of Brookston v. StoutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Coppage v. ReichardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Penrod v. FrenchIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Stone v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Hart v. State Ex Rel. EmmertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New York v. State Ex Rel. BrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API